Pawel Chwalowski, Thomas G. Ivanco

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-027

This paper presents the results of the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analyses to model two atmospheric-boundary-layer (ABL) profiles inside the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT). The CFD models include tunnel walls and all additional hardware needed to simulate the ABL profiles. This hardware includes Irwin spires and floor-mounted roughness elements. The numerical simulations show that the application of higher-fidelity numerical methods is necessary to compute boundary-layer and turbulenceintensity profiles that match experimental data. The ABL profiles are computed both inside the numerical model of the TDT and in a classical free-air model. Both Unsteady ReynoldsAveraged Navier-Stokes (URANS) with Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model and Modified Delayed Detached Eddy (MDDES) simulation methods are used. The results show that the MDDES-simulation results match the experimental data very well while URANS-SA does not. The results also show that the wind-tunnel walls have a significant effect on ABL prediction.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: IFASD 2019, Unsteady CFD
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.