Dominik Schäfer, Jürgen Arnold

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-010

This paper aims at assessing the gain in accuracy for T-tail flutter point prediction obtained by a strip theory approach used to enhance common linear potential flow theory based unsteady aerodynamic forces. The common approach neglects unsteady aerodynamic forces induced by lifting surface inplane and roll motion, which are crucial for T-tail flutter. The strip theory approach computes these additional terms based on aerodynamic forces from a steady state reference condition and the modal data of the underlying structural model. The correction is done by superposing the additional terms with the aerodynamic forces from the standard procedure. Generalized aerodynamic forces produced by the common approach and the enhanced approach in addition to resulting flutter points and aerodynamic Modal Power Transfer matrices are compared to those computed with aerodynamic forces from the linearized frequency domain CFD solver TAU-LFD. Two Mach numbers of 0.4 and 0.69 are chosen for this assessment. The model for the study is a generic T-tail with unswept and nontapered vertical and horizontal tail planes. Significant improvements of the flutter points of the T-tail for both Mach numbers can be achieved by the enhancement in relation to the CFD approach. A comparison of generalized aerodynamic forces and aerodynamic Modal Power Transfer values, however, reveals strengths and weaknesses of the method.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.