Fabio L. M. dos Santos, Bart Peeters, Jan Debille, Carmine Salzano, Luiz Carlos, S. Goes, Wim Desmet

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-122

Ground Vibration Testing (GVT) of aircraft is a measurement campaign performed in the development process of an aircraft, with the objective of obtaining experimental data of the aircraft to validate and update the structural dynamic models, which can in turn be used to predict important behavior, such as flutter. These measurements are usually carried out using standard accelerometers, which lead to the identification of the displacement mode shapes. However, the use of strain sensors in vibration and modal related applications has recently gained popularity, due to some advantages, such as sensor size and the fact that strain relates directly to stress. On the other hand, interpreting the strain mode shapes can sometimes be more complex, so the use of both strain and acceleration sensors can lead to a more complete and understandable dataset. In this paper, the main results of a GVT campaign on an F-16 aircraft will be shown, where the full aircraft was instrumented with accelerometers and one of the wings was also fully instrumented with dynamic strain sensors. The main results of the test campaign will be shown, where both strain sensor and accelerometer measurements are processed simultaneously, resulting in the strain and displacement mode shapes, respectively, and some characteristics and advantages of carrying out the tests this way will be presented.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.