Sean Meldrum, Pierre Hardy, Gabriel Broux, Eric Garrigues

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-121

During initial design phase the evaluation of the aircraft’s structural mass for various plan forms is still a challenge. The structural mass has to be minimized while sustaining loads and satisfying various aeroelastic constraints. These constraints could be avoiding flutter phenomena in the flight envelope or guarantying static aeroelastic characteristics such as aileron efficiency. This paper describes an industrial method developed at Dassault Aviation to perform this aero-structural optimization. This fully automatic process can compute the optimized structural weights of several configurations. Combining this with aerodynamic performance data for each configuration, it becomes a powerful tool to drive the design of new aircraft. First the global outline of the process will be presented. Then the elementary blocs of the process will be briefly described; finite element modelling, aerodynamic and load computation and finally optimization strategy. Finally two applications will be shown to demonstrate the relevance of the project. The first example is that of a flutter optimization done during the development of a new Falcon jet. The flutter optimization is shown to be an efficient tool to minimize structural reinforcement for flutter and thus improve global aircraft performance. The second application is a study using the complete process to determine the effect of the winglet’s height on aircraft mass. The optimized mass of the wing, with respect to both flutter and loads, is calculated for three different winglet heights. The aim is to demonstrate the potential of the process to drive aircraft design and find an optimal shape with respect to both aerodynamic performance and aircraft mass.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.