Ryan C. Kitson, Carlos E. S. Cesnik

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-005

Future transportation aircraft requirements focused on energy efficiency and environmental impact are leading to design concepts with very high-aspect-ratio wings. These slender wings aim to maximize efficiency by reducing drag and lowering structural weight. The corresponding wing structures have larger structural deformations under aerodynamic loading and tighter coupling between the aeroelastic response and flight dynamics of the vehicle. Current engineering practice is to use linearized models for preliminary design of flight control and gust alleviation systems, but these models may not be able to capture nonlinearities in the vehicle response. The coupled aeroelastic and flight dynamic response of two aircraft designs were investigated to better understand the nonlinear aeroelastic implications of these future design trends. This paper reports the responses of two future configurations to control inputs and compares the results to linearized models. The linearized models are able to capture the structural and flight dynamic responses for moderate maneuvers and perturbations, but they show significant error for more aggressive maneuvers within the expected operating range.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.