Yingsong Gu, Zhichun Yang, Pier Marzocca, Shun He

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-227

Aeroelastic modeling, analysis, and wind tunnel flutter test was conducted to investigate the body freedom flutter problem of a blended wing body (BWB) like flexible plate. The plate is made by aluminum with constant thickness of 0.2mm which resembles the shape of a high aspect-ratio configuration. Two types of suspension, i.e. nylon cord (D = 0.23mm) and bungee cord (D = 0.8mm), were implemented to study the influence of support stiffness on the body freedom flutter characteristics of the BWB like plate model. A gyro, attached on the upper surface of the plate model, was employed as sensor and connected to the data acquisition Arduino board by a flexible electric wire for data acquisition. It is found that both suspension types and the flexibility of the gyro ’s electric wire contribute to the support stiffness. While with the current suspension setup neither the free-free pitching mode, due to the added pitching stiffness coming from the flexible wire, not the free-free plunging mode, due to the suspension stiffness, could be accomplished, the flutter results predicted by an updated model accounting for the support stiffness, could produce quite satisfactory agreement with the test results. Lesson learned suggests that neither elastic nor rigid suspension can fully satisfy the body freedom flutter test requirement, and free-flying model setup is recommended for future wind tunnel test.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.