Valentina Motta, Leonie Malzacher, Dieter Peitsch

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-137

Virtual control surfaces are assessed numerically as a means to enhance the aeroelastic response of a compressor cascade. Virtual surfaces are realized with plasma actuators placed on the pressure and on the suction side of the blade trailing edge. Advantages of plasma actuators over mechanical control surfaces are the absence of failure risks when operating under centrifugal and temperature fields typical of compressors used in aero engines. The plasmainduced flow is meant to be against the direction of the freestream. This allows for generating controlled recirculating flow areas and in turn modifying the effective blade camber and enlarging the actual chord. Computational fluid dynamic analyses with the blades at constant angle of attack show that the effects of pressure side actuation on flow field, pressure distribution and integral loads are comparable to those of flap-like devices. On the contrary suction side actuation yields effects which are analogous to those of wing spoilers. Traveling wave simulations for the torsion mode show that properly triggering an alternate pressure/suction side actuation during the pitching cycle improves significantly the blade aeroelastic stability. At the same time an effective reduction in the peaks of the oscillating airloads is achieved, with potential benefits for the alleviation of fatigue.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.