Eden Schiavinato de SOUZA, Lucas RIBEIRO, Leda VIALTA, Pedro MATOS, Luiz BARRETA, Giannino CAMILLO, Israel RÊGO, Lucas GALEMBECK, Dermeval CARINHANA JR, Pedro LACAVA

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST2024-00222

The relation between the spatial pressure profile and global equivalence ratio was investigated in a hydrogen-fueled supersonic combustor directly connected to a shock tunnel facility. The combustor model comprises an initial constant area section (isolator), followed by a single-hole fuel injection point, a flame-holder cavity, and finally, an expansion ramp. The results were obtained for a freestream inlet flow at Mach 2.7, static temperature of 705 K, and static pressure of 164 kPa, with stagnation conditions at 1,470 K and 3.8 MPa. The global equivalence ratio (ER) ranged from 0.10 to 0.50. Dynamic pressure transducers were installed along the combustor model, schlieren images were used to assess the flow profile, and a high-speed OH* chemiluminescence emission technique was employed to verify the occurrence of supersonic hydrogen combustion. Substantial increases in combustion pressures relative to the reference were observed. These increases were in accordance with theoretical predictions for ER ranging from 0.10 to 0.25, showing an increase of 1.5 to 2.3 times the reference pressure. For ER values between 0.25 and 0.50, the pressure increases stabilized at approximately 2.3 times the reference pressure.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.