Matthew UREN, Yu LIU, Chris JAMES, Richard MORGAN

DOI Number: 10.60853/nvcf-nd72

Conference number: HiSST-2024-00111

A dedicated exploration mission of the ice giant planets has been prioritized as a key scientific objective by many organizations, including NASA and ESA, to further understanding of their formation and atmospheric structure. In-situ measurements of the planetary atmosphere for giant planets has been successfully demonstrated with the Jupiter Galileo probe, however, there are significant uncertainties surrounding thermal loading and peak heating during giant planet entry. The usage of ground test facilities, such as free-piston impulse shock tunnels, allows for the experimental simulation of planetary entry aerothermodynamics where such uncertainties can be investigated. The X2 expansion tube at The University of Queensland is a hypersonic test facility able to simulate giant planet entry representative test flows for entry capsule model geometries, yielding valuable insights regarding the non-equilibrium processes in the shock layer that can influence survivability during entry. For assessing surface heat flux in hypersonic test facilities, the non-intrusive optical technique infrared thermography can be used, and this has been demonstrated successfully for Earth and Mars entry representative test flows. However, it has not yet been performed for giant planet entry flows in facilities such as X2. Therefore, this work will detail the characterisation and assessment of Uranus peak heating entry conditions in the X2 expansion tube and the suitability of the flow environment for future infrared thermography experiments.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.