Young Jin KIM, Hyoung Jin LEE

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number: HiSST-0041

Scramjet engines used for efficient flight in supersonic and hypersonic areas have the disadvantage of not generating thrust at subsonic and stationary conditions. Therefore, ramjet or scramjet engines are not used alone but in complex cycles such as TBCC(Turbine Based Combined Cycle) and RBCC (Rocket Based Combined Cycle) combined with turbine or rocket engines. In such an integrated propulsion system, a configuration design for a variable inlet is required since operation is essential in a wide range of Mach numbers. In this study, the required mass flow conditions of the TBCC aircraft were derived, and the shape design and detailed design procedures of the variable inlet satisfying them were presented. The maximum operating Mach number of the variable inlet was set to 7, and the shape of the variable suction port was designed using variable lamps and cowls to satisfy the required flow rate conditions for each Mach number. Boundary layer correction and computational analysis were performed on the designed shape. As a result of two-dimensional numerical simulation, it was confirmed that the mass flow rate flowing into the inlet satisfies the requirements. After that, a wind tunnel test was performed by creating a reduction model for the variable inlet for Mach 2 and 7. The supersonic wind tunnel was used in Mach 2, and the hypersonic shock wave tunnel was used in Mach 7. In each test, the inlet performance analysis was performed through back pressure control and verification of the designed inlet shape. As a result of the wind tunnel test, it was verified that the shape of the inlet in each Mach number was carried out properly, and the starting characteristics according to the back pressure were confirmed.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.