Vivien Loridan, Simon Peluchon, Jean Claudel

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-04

The present work aims at improving the numerical prediction of graphite material degradation during
an entire reentry phase. For this purpose, 2D axisymmetric simulations are carried out on the nosetip of
the IRV-2 vehicle, which is a well-referred test case that employed a thermal protection system composed
of non-charring carbon. The coupled fluid / thermal approach adopted for such aerothermodynamics
computations is presented, as well as two different ablation models, which both rely on the heterogeneous
reactions of oxidation and sublimation that occur on the heat shield of the vehicle. The first ablation
paradigm is based on the B’ tabulation, which has been historically used to assess the blowing rate
of the recessing wall in the framework of a single gas (air) at chemical equilibrium. If such strategy
has proven its reliability and efficiency over the past few decades, it suffers from many assumptions
that are prone to be broken when applied to realistic descent trajectories. Such hypotheses include the
consideration of a chemical equilibrium at the wall, a supposedly weak blowing rate, no injection of the
ablated carbonaceous species into the flow, and the use of convective coefficients that directly depend
on the boundary layer location. To overcome these aforementioned limitations, a more relevant ablation
model, which takes care of the intrinsic multi-species nature of the flow, is proposed and implemented.
The ablating mass flux and the species mass fractions at the wall, which are the product of finite-rate
surface chemistry mechanisms, are accurately performed and updated at each convergence step of the
flow. A particular emphasis is made on the generalization to chemical nonequilibrium, which leads to
reducing the ablated surface thickness during a complete trajectory. In this perspective, the influence
of the injected species that react with the surrounding flow is also investigated. Finally, the effects of
different surface reaction schemes on the ablated surface shape and temperature are discussed.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: HiSST 2022
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.