Naresh Relangi, Antonella Ingenito, Jeyakumar S

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-266

The interest in hypersonic flights lies in the possibility of reaching antipodal terrestrial distances in about
a couple of hours at Mach 8. To make this technology ready, some issues still need to be addressed.
At supersonic flight speeds, the air residence time is of the order of 1 millisecond: fuel and air must be
mixed and burned completely in a very short time. The flow field within the combustor of the scramjet
engine is very complex and poses a considerable challenge in the design and development of a
supersonic combustor with optimized geometry. This combustor must promote sufficient mixing of fuelair and flame stabilisation avoiding excessive pressure losses and consequently penalties in thrust
efficiency. Therefore, the development of scramjet engines poses considerable challenges and requires
multidisciplinary design, analysis, modeling, simulation and system optimization. Several studies have
been carried out worldwide, and various concepts have been suggested for scramjet combustor
configurations to overcome the limitations given by the short flow residence time. In this paper,
performance of an innovative axisymmetric configuration has been numerically investigated by means
of LES. Results show that a combustion efficiency of 80% may be attained assuming an upstream
injection into the cavity.

Read the full paper >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.