Fabian Hufgard, Stefan Löhle , Tobias Hermann , Sven Schweikert , Matthew McGilvray , Jens von Wolfersdorf, Johan Steelant , Stefanos Fasoulas

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST 2018_2330896

The Non-Integer System Identification (NISI) method is an useful tool for the determination of surface heat flux from in-depth temperature data even in transpiration cooled environments. Recently it was demonstrated that in these transpiration cooled environments the surface heat flux can be determined using a measurement of the plenum pressure changes in the gas reservoir at the rear side of the porous structure for the Non-Integer System Identification (NISIp). This paper presents fundamental experiments required for the identification of susceptibilities with respect to the thermophysical and fluid properties. Test results with two different porous materials are compared: zirconium diboride and carbon/carbon. The experimental setup for both systems and the respective resulting impulse responses over varying coolant mass flows are presented and discussed in this paper. It was found that the pressure impulse responses of the ZrB2 system is more sensitive to coolant mass flow rate changes than the C/C system with respect to both response time and amplitude pressure. However, the absolute response time of the C/C system was significantly shorter for all tested flow rates

Read the full paper from the KU Leuven website >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.